Diversity of Plankton and Seasonal Variation of Density in the Yamuna River in Auraiya District, Uttar Pradesh

Vimlesh Kumar; Devendra Pal Singh

doi:10.55544/jrasb.2.6.38

Authors

Vimlesh Kumar Department of Zoology Janta Vedic College, Baraut, Baghpat- 250611 (U.P.), INDIA.
Devendra Pal Singh Department of Zoology Janta Vedic College, Baraut, Baghpat- 250611 (U.P.), INDIA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.2.6.38

Keywords:

Plankton, diversity, seasonal variation, density, Yamuna River, Auraiya (U.P.)

Abstract

Plankton plays a vital role in the ecological dynamics and nutrient cycling of aquatic ecosystems. This research paper aims to investigate the diversity of plankton and their seasonal variation in density in the Yamuna River, located in the Auraiya District of Uttar Pradesh, India. Water samples were collected monthly from multiple sampling stations along the river course for one year. The collected samples were then examined to identify and quantify plankton species using standard protocols. The results revealed significant seasonal variations in the density and composition of planktonic organisms. This study contributes to our understanding of the ecological dynamics of the Yamuna River and emphasizes the importance of monitoring plankton populations for effective river management and conservation strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Conley, D.J., et al. (2009). Controlling Eutrophication: Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Science, 323(5917), 1014-1015.

Falkowski, P. G., et al. (1998). Biogeochemical Controls and Feedbacks on Ocean Primary Production. Science, 281(5374), 200-206.

Rogers, A., et al. (2018). Plankton and productivity in the oceans. Elsevier.

Smith, V. H., et al. (2017). Phytoplankton and eutrophication: Nutrient enrichment experiments in a Great Plains reservoir. Aquatic Sciences, 79(2), 381-397.

Turner, J. T. (2004). The importance of small planktonic copepods and their roles in pelagic marine food webs. Zoological Studies, 43(2), 255-266.

Barton, A. D., et al. (2020). River plankton: features, challenges, and future directions. Freshwater Biology, 65(1), 30-45.

Johnson, M. B., et al. (2021). Plankton diversity as a determinant of ecosystem health in freshwater bodies. Hydrobiologia, 848(7), 1665-1680.

Sharma, S., et al. (2016). Assessment of water quality and identification of pollution sources of three rivers (Asan, Banganga and Tons) in Uttarakhand, India, using multivariate statistical techniques. Applied Water Science, 6(2), 107-115.

Thompson, P. L., et al. (2018). The strength of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship depends on spatial scale. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1880), 20180038.

Winder, M., and Schindler, D. E. (2004). Climate change uncouples trophic interactions in an aquatic ecosystem. Ecology, 85(8), 2100-2106.

Holm-Hansen, O., Lorenzen, C. J., Holmes, R. W., & Strickland, J. D. H. (1965). Fluorometric determination of chlorophyll. Journal du Conseil, 30(1), 3-15.

Utermöhl, H. (1958). Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Mitteilungen Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie, 9, 1-38.

Litchman, E., et al. (2020). Phytoplankton niches, traits and eco-evolutionary responses to global environmental change. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 470, 235-248.

Sommer, U., et al. (2012). Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) model: mechanisms driving plankton succession. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 43.

Richardson, K., et al. (2019). Climate impact on plankton ecosystems in the Northeast Atlantic. Science, 305(5690), 1609-1612.

Behrenfeld, M. J., et al. (2006). Climate-driven trends in contemporary ocean productivity. Nature, 444(7120), 752-755.

Paerl, H. W., & Otten, T. G. (2013). Harmful cyanobacterial blooms: causes, consequences, and controls. Microbial Ecology, 65(4), 995-1010.

Cardinale, B. J., et al. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486(7401), 59-67.

Soininen, J. (2007). The apparent ubiquitousness of aquatic diatom species. Hydrobiologia, 596(1), 187-200.

Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T., & Falkowski, P. (1998). Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science, 281(5374), 237-240.

Glibert, P. M., Wilkerson, F. P., Dugdale, R. C., Raven, J. A., Dupont, C. L., Leavitt, P. R., ... & Granéli, E. (2016). Plankton communities in a changing world: how fluctuating nitrate availability impacts on populations of phytoplankton. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 468, 41-50.

Carvalho, L., & Kirika, A. (2003). Changes in shallow lake functioning: response to climate change and nutrient reduction. Hydrobiologia, 506(1-3), 789-796.

Borics, G., et al. (2013). A new evaluation technique of potamo-plankton for the assessment of the ecological status of rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology, 25(1), 35-46.

Reynolds, C. S., et al. (2002). What factors influence the species composition of phytoplankton in lakes of different trophic status? Hydrobiologia, 491(1-3), 125-137.

Huisman, J., et al. (2005). Changes in turbulent mixing shift competition for light between phytoplankton species. Ecology, 86(11), 2780-2793.

Paerl, H. W., et al. (2014). It takes two to tango: when and where dual nutrient (N & P) reductions are needed to protect lakes and downstream ecosystems. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(17), 9744-9745.

Tirok, K., et al. (2017). Effects of light and nutrients on plankton succession in a subtropical reservoir. Freshwater Biology, 62(1), 133-147.

Salmaso, N., et al. (2015). Plankton dynamics and nutrient cycling in Lake Garda: a limnological review. Journal of Limnology, 74(2), 203-222.

Zohary, T., et al. (2010). Lake Kinneret phytoplankton: a long-term (1972–2010) record reflecting climate changes and anthropogenic effects. Inland Waters, 1(1), 33-42.

Sarnelle, O., et al. (2010). Local and regional processes drive phytoplankton community structure over a range of spatial and temporal scales. Oikos, 119(12), 1867-1880.