Mutagenesis Induced Improvement of Coenzyme Q10 Production by Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Authors

  • Brajeshwar Singh Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, SKUAST-Jammu, INDIA
  • Yasmin Akhter Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, SKUAST-Jammu, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.1.2.7

Keywords:

Agrobacterium tumefaciens, CoQ10, mutagenesis, fermentation parameters

Abstract

Mutagenesis induced improvement of coenzyme Q10 production by Agrobacterium tumefaciens with the view of increasing CoQ10 production via strain development by UV and EMS mutagenesis is of great importance. Further optimisation of fermentation parameters such as pH, temperature, and inoculum load was done to maximise CoQ10 yield. Soil and gall samples were collected from vegetable field of Research farm located at Chatha, Jammu. Repeated isolations and purification resulted in 05 Agrobacterium tumefaciens cultures from soil samples and 07 from that of gall samples. Identification of cultures was confirmed by morphological studies. Agrobacterium tumefaciens cultures were grown on selective media to screen CoQ10 producing strains. G12 was best amongst 12 isolates; it produced 2.36 mg/g DCW. Mutagenesis using UV and EMS treatment was done to obtain a high-CoQ10-producing strain from the native isolate (G12). When exposed for 7 minutes to mutagenic UV radiation from a distance of 10 cm, the native strain (G12) showed reduction in number of colonies. Also the viability of cells was reduced when they were treated with 80 μM EMS for 30 min but it was less effective than UV mutagenesis. G12 UV mutant strain was selected after screening and tested for CoQ10 production potential by flask culturing. Our results indicate that CoQ10 content increased from 2.36 mg/g DCW to 4.34 mg/ g DCW after mutagenesis, indicating positive mutations. G12 UV mutant was further studied in batch cultures with different inoculum loads at various temperatures and range of pH, to maximize CoQ10 production along with constant fermentation parameters like agitation (180 rpm) and incubation time (96 hours). Therefore, this study suggests that amongst the culture conditions tested so far for CoQ10 production, G12 mutant strain showed maximum CoQ10 content when 108 CFU/ml of inoculum load is used at 32°C and pH 7.0.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ali, N., Zada, A., Ali, M. and Hussain, Z. 2016. Isolation and identification of Agrobacterium tumefaciens from the galls of peach tree. Journal of Pure and Applied Agriculture, 1(1): 39-48.

Beal, M.F. 2004. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases and coenzyme Q 10 as a potential treatment. Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes, 36(4): 381-386.

Brown, S., Clastre, M., Courdavault, V. and O’Connor, S.E. 2015. De novo production of the plant-derived alkaloid strictosidine in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(11): 3205-3210.

Chandra, M., Kalra, A., Sangwan, N.S., Gaurav, S.S., Darokar, M.P. and Sangwan, R.S. 2009. Development of a mutant of Trichoderma citrinoviride for enhanced production of cellulases. Bioresource Technology, 100(4): 1659-1662.

Choi, J.H., Ryu, Y.W. and Seo, J.H. 2005b. Biotechnological production and applications of coenzyme Q 10. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 68(1): 9-15.

Dixson, D.D., Boddy, C.N. and Doyle, R.P. 2011. Reinvestigation of coenzyme Q10 isolation from Sporidiobolus johnsonii. Chemistry & biodiversity, 8(6): 1033-1051.

Du, J., Shao, Z. and Zhao, H. 2011. Engineering microbial factories for synthesis of value-added products. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 38(8): 873-890.

Ernster, L. and Dallner, G. 1995. Biochemical, physiological and medical aspects of ubiquinone function. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Basis of Disease, 1271: 195-204.

Ha, S.J., Kim, S.Y., Seo, J.H., Oh, D.K. and Lee, J.K. 2007b. Optimization of culture conditions and scale-up to pilot and plant scales for coenzyme Q 10 production by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 74(5): 974-980.

Hihi, A.K., Kébir, H. and Hekimi, S. 2003. Sensitivity of Caenorhabditis elegans clk-1 mutants toubiquinone side-chain length reveals multiple ubiquinone-dependent processes. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(42): 41013-41018.

Islam, M.S., Akter, M.M., Rahman, M.A., Rahman, M.M., Akhtar, M.M. and Alam, M.F. 2010. Isolation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains from crown gall sample of dicot plants in Bangladesh. Curr. Res. Bacteriol, 3: 27-36.

Jullesson, D., David, F., Pfleger, B. and Nielsen, J. 2015. Impact of synthetic biology and metabolic engineering on industrial production of fine chemicals. Biotechnology advances, 33(7): 1395-1402.

Kawamukai, M. 2002. Biosynthesis, bioproduction and novel roles of ubiquinone. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 94(6): 511-517.

Kawamukai, M. 2009. Biosynthesis and bioproduction of coenzyme Q10 by yeasts and other organisms. Biotechnology and applied biochemistry, 53(4): 217-226.

Lee, J.W., Na, D., Park, J.M., Lee, J., Choi, S. and Lee, S.Y. 2012. Systems metabolic engineering of microorganisms for natural and non-natural chemicals. Nature chemical biology, 8(6): 536-546

Lee, S.Q.E., Tan, T.S., Kawamukai, M. and Chen, E.S. 2017. Cellular factories for coenzyme Q 10 production. Microbial cell factories, 16(1): 1-16.

Lu, W., Ye, L., Lv, X., Xie, W., Gu, J., Chen, Z., Zhu, Y., Li, A. and Yu, H. 2015. Identification and elimination of metabolic bottlenecks in the quinone modification pathway for enhanced coenzyme Q10 production in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Metabolic engineering, 29: 208-216.

Mary, X.A., Varghese, A.M., Jayasurya, J., Sindhuja, S. and Devi, S.G. 2017. Isolation and pathogenecity study of Agrobacterium from rhizospheric soil of Albizia Saman. Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 3: 23-27

Mu, F.S., Luo, M., Fu, Y.J., Zhang, X., Yu, P. and Zu, Y.G. 2011. Synthesis of the key intermediate of coenzyme Q10. Molecules, 16(5): 4097-4103.

Murphy, A.C. 2011. Metabolic engineering is key to a sustainable chemical industry. Natural product reports, 28(8): 1406-1425.

Nester, E.W. 2015. Agrobacterium: nature’s genetic engineer. Frontiers in plant science, 5: 730.

Nielsen, J., Fussenegger, M., Keasling, J., Lee, S.Y., Liao, J.C., Prather, K. and Palsson, B. 2014. Engineering synergy in biotechnology. Nature chemical biology, 10(5): 319-322.

Okada, K., Kainou, T., Matsuda, H. and Kawamukai, M. 1998. Biological significance of the side chain length of ubiquinone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS letters, 431(2): 241-244.

Pahari, S.K., Ghosh, S., Halder, S. and Jana, M. 2016. Role of Coenzyme Q10 in human life. Research journal of pharmacy and technology, 9(6): 635-640.

Portakal, O., Özkaya, Ö., Bozan, B., Koşan, M. and Sayek, I. 2000. Coenzyme Q10 concentrations and antioxidant status in tissues of breast cancer patients. Clinical biochemistry, 33(4): 279-284.

Pscheidt, B. and Glieder, A. 2008. Yeast cell factories for fine chemical and API production. Microbial cell factories, 7(1): 1-36.

Ranadive, P., Mehta, A. and George, S. 2011. Strain improvement of Sporidiobolus johnsonii ATCC 20490 for biotechnological production of Coenzyme Q10. Int J Chem Eng Appl, 2(3): 216-220.

Rhouma, A., Boubaker, A.A., Nesme, X. and Dessaux, Y. 2006. Plasmid and chromosomal diversity of a Tunisian collection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains. Tunisian journal of plant protection, 1(2): 73-84.

Shams, M., Campillo, T., Lavire, C., Muller, D., Nesme, X. and Vial, L. 2012. Rapid and efficient methods to isolate, type strains and determine species of Agrobacterium spp. in pure culture and complex environments. Biochemical Testing, 4: 3-20.

Sheldon, R.A. 2014. Green and sustainable manufacture of chemicals from biomass: state of the art. Green Chemistry, 16(3): 950-963.

Singh, R.B., Niaz, M.A., Rastogi, S.S. and Verma, S.P. 1999. Coenzyme Q10 and its role in heart disease. Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition, 26(2): 109-118.

Tian, Y., Yue, T., Pei, J., Yuan, Y., Li, J. and Martin Lo, Y. 2010. Effects of cell lysis treatments on the yield of coenzyme Q10 following Agrobacterium tumefaciens fermentation. Food Science and Technology International, 16(2): 195-203.

Tokdar, P., Wani, A., Kumar, P., Ranadive, P. and George, S. 2013. Process and strain development for reduction of broth viscosity with improved yield in coenzyme Q10 fermentation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens ATCC 4452. Ferment Technol, 2(1).

Turunen, M., Olsson, J. and Dallner, G. 2004. Metabolism and function of coenzyme Q. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes, 1660(1-2): 171-199.

Wang, Y. and Hekimi, S. 2013. Molecular genetics of ubiquinone biosynthesis in animals. Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology, 48(1): 69-88.

Wenda, S., Illner, S., Mell, A. and Kragl, U. 2011. Industrial biotechnology—the future of green chemistry?. Green Chemistry, 13(11): 3007-3047.

Yoshida, H., Kotani, Y., Ochiai, K. and Araki, K. 1998. Production of ubiquinone-10 using bacteria. The Journal of general and applied microbiology, 44(1): 19-26.

Yuan, Y., Tian, Y. and Yue, T. 2012. Improvement of coenzyme Q10 production: mutagenesis induced by high hydrostatic pressure treatment and optimization of fermentation conditions. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Singh, B., & Akhter, Y. (2022). Mutagenesis Induced Improvement of Coenzyme Q10 Production by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 1(2), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.1.2.7

Issue

Section

Articles